Hidden Truth/Hidden Truth.iso/data/misctexts/web-texts/4626

Internet Message Format | 1996-07-20 | 20.0 KB

Path: news.demon.co.uk!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!arclight.uoregon.edu!enews.sgi.com!ames!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!newshub.nosc.mil!newshub.cts.com!news
From: [e-mail] (Blue Resonant Human)
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.abduct
Subject: HME 3/6: UFO-Related Homicide in Brazil
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 1996 03:06:13 GMT
Organization: CTS Network Services
Lines: 370
Message-ID: <4ss70g$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: density4.cts.com
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: news.demon.co.uk alt.alien.visitors:96043 alt.paranet.ufo:58135 alt.alien.research:29932 alt.paranet.abduct:6697

UFO-Related Homicide in Brazil: The Complete Story
[from International UFO Magazine]

By G. Cope Schellhorn


If this case is authentically UFO-related - and at this time I
have no reason to believe it is not - then all of us are going
to have to reevaluate to one degree or another our tentative
conclusions as to the possible specific intentions, moral
perspectives and general agenda that some of our
extraterrestrial visitors may have.

There have been rumors of homicidal, UFO-related, human
mutilation cases for some time now but hard evidence has been
lacking.  Until, perhaps, now.  Brazilian ufologist Encarnacion
Zapata Garcia and Dr. Rubens Goes have recently presented a
series of sensational photographs, obtained from police files
which mimic the wounds of countless UFO-related animal
mutilation cases that have been reported in Europe and North,
Central and South America since the 1960s.  On first glance they
would seem to be ufology's worst nightmare.

What is more disturbing is that Brazilian urologists and police
have intimated that there may be at least a dozen or more cases
similar to the recently uncovered Guarapiranga reservoir case.
If this is true, it is somewhat doubtful that any of this
potential new material will ever see the light of day, given the
official attitudes now prevailing in Western power circles.  But
we can be grateful for fortuitous disclosures, and the
Guarapiranga case and it's accompanying photographs seem to be
just that.  A great stroke of luck, albeit a dismaying one.
Obviously if the Guarapiranga data is legitimate, then it
becomes increasingly difficult to maintain the position that all
visitors are demonstrating a relatively friendly attitude toward
humans, regardless of what their specific agenda(s) may be.  The
Guarapiranga situation indicates that there is at least one
group of alien visitors to the planet who have a complete
disdain for human sensibilities, who, in fact, could care less
about the value of human life.

When I learned of the Guarapiranga case through Brazilian
ufologist A.J. Gevaerd, who first published the related photos
in his magazine UFO, my interest was stimulated and I quickly
made plans for a trip to Brazil.  In Sao Paulo I met Encarnacion
Garcia at the home of well known ufologist Claudeir Covo and
talked with her later at length.  Then I traveled to Campo
Grande and questioned Gevaerd.  He was kind enough to supply me
with second generation photographs (the best available) of the
Guarapiranga reservoir victim having himself become thoroughly
convinced that the evidence supporting the case was authentic
and that the case was UFO-related.  I came to the same
conclusion because all other alternatives were neither supported
by facts nor good logic, whereas the similarities to numerous
cattle mutilations which I had studied in the United States were
startling, exactly paralleling what I have seen many times
before.

The specifics of the case are as follows:

Encarnacion Garcia learned from her friend, Dr. Rubens Goes,
that he was in possession of some rather "odd" photos which had
been given to him by his cousin, police technician, Rubens
Sergio.  These were official photos of a body that had been
found near Guarapiranga reservoir on the 29th of September,
1988, of an unnamed male who was, however, later identified.
The name of this man has been withheld from all media
investigators, including UFO investigators, at the request of
his relatives.

After studying the photos, Encarnacion Garcia was impressed with
how similar the wounds of the body were to those found on the
carcasses of so many UFO-related mutilated animals, knowledge
which the original investigating police officials and medical
doctors involved with the case did not possess.  Surprisingly,
Dr. Cuenca, head of the primary investigation, offered his files
on the case.  This is the stroke of luck which I previously
mentioned and for which we can all be thankful.  These included
the all-. important autopsy description to which I will
momentarily refer.

The initial police report, however, was not extraordinary in
nature except for the recognition that the body, although
extremely mutilated, had not met with unusual violence; that is,
there were no signs of struggle or the application of bondage of
any kind.

It was the autopsy report itself which was most revealing,
especially when we compare the remarks made there with what we
have learned from animal mutilation cases elsewhere.  It is
imperative to remember, as I have stated previously, that the
individuals conducting the autopsy had no knowledge of similar
animal mutilation cases.  This makes the official remarks of the
report all the more revealing in retrospect.

Encarnacion Garcia received copies of seven photos.  I have
included the five most revealing ones here with a description
and commentary.  The work of the perpetrators of this atrocity:
the kinds of cuts made, the precision of the cuts, the removal
of whole internal organs through small apertures, the lack of
bleeding, the failure of the body to smell or decompose rapidly -
all these are hallmarks of UFO-related animal mutilations.
These peculiarities would seem to rule out Satanists, revenge-
seekers or casual mutilators and go beyond even the capacities
of a modern Jack the Ripper.

photo #I: Face and upper torso photo.  The body was in perfect
condition.  Rigor mortis had not set in and it was estimated
that the victim had been killed approximately 48 to 72 hours
previously.  There were no signs of animal predation or
putrefaction which might be expected.  Strangely, there was no
odor to the cadaver.  Bleeding from the wounds had been minimal.
The black coloration found in the face area and in other places
within the photo is partly due to low light exposure when this
photo and others were taken.  It is also partly due to
coagulated blood in the wound areas.

As can clearly be seen, flesh and lips have been excised around
the mandibles, as is common in cattle and other animal
mutilations, the autopsy report noted that "the eyes and ears
were also removed and the mouth cavity was emptied."  Removal of
these body parts, including the tongue as here, is common enough
in animal mutilation cases.

As Encarnacion Garcia rightly recognized, if a comparison of the
victim with animal mutilation cases is made, "You can see they
are the same - and that is also the conclusion of experienced
doctors."  The doctors drew their conclusion only after they had
been shown photographs of similar animal mutilation cases, cases
with which they were not previously familiar.

The autopsy report states: "There has been a removal of
extensive tissue along many parts of the face, head and neck of
the victim...  There has also been extraction of ocular tissue,
eyes, auditive internal and external organs (ears) and entire
parts of the head.  The tongue and several muscles were also
extracted."

The kinds of cuts on the cadaver are what we have come to expect
in UFO-related animal mutilation cases.  Of primary interest is
their precision.  The "surgery" (or butchery, if you will) was
done with agility and care and probably with speed.  The lack of
profuse bleeding suggests the use of a laser-like instrument
producing acute heat, thus cauterizing almost immediately the
edge of the wounds.  This is a speculation on my part, however,
:although there are numerous precedents.  Many of the cases
studied by Dr. John Altshuler in the United States exhibit this
kind of high heat, rapid surgery.  Whether it would still be
possible to test fragments of the flesh from the victim's wound
areas is doubtful.  Suffice it to say the wounds appear to be
exact replicas of cases studied by Dr. Altshuler, Tom Adams, Bob
Pratt, Ted Oliphant, Linda Howe, Colman VonKeviczky and myself.

Photo #2: (Above) Face and upper torso with arms outstretched.
Perhaps it is best to begin here with several quotes from the
autopsy report.  "The axillary regions on both sides showed soft
spots where organs had been removed.  Incisions were made on the
face, internal thorax, abdomen, legs, arms, and chest."  As
Garcia observed, the doctors stated that these wounds were quite
uncommon.  The report also observes, "Shoulders and arms have
perforations of 1 to 1.5 inches in diameter where tissue and
muscles were extracted.  The edges of the perforations were
uniform and so was their size.  The chest had shrunk due to the
removal of internal organs."

In other words, internal organs were removed or sucked somehow
through these small circular incisions.  Why such a technique?
Some doctors today are using a similar method to remove diseased
tissue and organs from their human subjects - but this kind of
procedure injures those organs in the process.  Did the
"surgeons" who worked on this victim care whether the organs
were injured or not?  What kind of specimens were they looking
for?  What kind of research is this?  Wouldn't it be easier and
more medically expedient to abduct a human specimen and study it
live, including its anatomy and physiology, in a properly
equipped laboratory?  It would appear that the perpetrators of
this act did not care if the man's life was lost nor did they
care if the body were found.  Here we have strong indication of
a total disregard for the specimen and, by extension, for human
life in general.  The body was left as trash.  What does this
say about the perpetrators and their
attitudes?

The photo clearly shows the symmetrical holes in the man's arms.
One arm clearly shows the sunken area near the perforation
clearly, demonstrating where muscle has been extracted.  The
shrunken chest area also indicates a similar process of internal
extractions.  It is significant that the police and medical
examiners were convinced the holes found in the head, arms,
stomach, anus and legs were not produced by bullet wounds.

Photo #3: Close up of the left side of the victim's head.  Here
we see that the ear is cleanly excised.  As the report states,
"auditive internal and external" matter was removed   The photo
does not show the small holes discovered in the cranium.  These
were detected, however, by the medical examiners.  How much, if
any, of the brain tissue was removed is not stated.

Photo #4: Close up of lower torso including thighs.  The
stretcher, pants and cord that are visible belonged to the
rescue team.  The autopsy report continues, "You also find the
removal of the belly button leaving a 1.5 inch hole in the
abdomen and a depressed abdominal cavity showing the removal of
the intestines."  Brazilian doctors who later viewed the
evidence were left nonplused by the hole in the umbilical area
where, it appeared, "a great amount of internal organs were
extracted.  The edge of the hole was perfect and shows a
precision cut.  Also, the abdominal area of the body was very
shrunken because of organ removal."  The original autopsy report
notes that "the scrotum was also removed by a 3 x 1.5 cm.
elliptical incision."  Strangely, the penis itself was left
intact although it appeared to have been stretched to about
twice its normal length.  Why excise the scrotum without taking
the penis?  Human logic is defied by such actions.  We are
aware, however, of the great similarity here with other animal
mutilation cases, particularly female cattle where it is not
unusual to see anus, teats, vagina and uterus extracted.  But
why exactly this is done is as big a mystery as who the exact
perpetrators are, although there is enough strong circumstantial
evidence to implicate UFO involvement.

The hole in the left leg duplicates in size the umbilical hole
and the arm hole previously discussed.  In the words of the
autopsy report, "It was an... elliptical incision of about 3 x 1.
5 cm...The penis was stretched and had no signs of being cut.
The testicles were extracted with a precision cut."  Rather
startling is the lack of pubic hair, as if the victim had been
readied for surgery.

Early on in the investigation, Brazilian official investigators
considered the possibility that the castration of the victim was
an act of revenge.  They soon rejected this theory, however,
because it could not account for the remaining wounds and the
other peculiarities related to the body.  What is more, revenge
seekers who castrate usually excise the penis, not just the
scrotum.

Photo #5: Victim lying on his stomach.  The autopsy report
specifies: -"Removal of the anus and a hole between the second
and third toes...The anal orifice of the victim was extracted
with a large incision about 3 by 6 inches in diameter.  The
rectum and other internal parts of the human discharge system
were also removed.  It is probable that even some of the
internal organs of the man could have been removed through this
incision."

What is most compelling about the anal incision and the
extraction of anal and digestive tract tissue is that it is a
carbon copy of the surgery we have seen in so many UFO-related
animal mutilation cases.  Are we supposed to believe a
revengeful human or a group of Satanists are capable of such
precise, difficult, surgical techniques/procedures which leave
even medical professionals perplexed as to how they could have
been done?  I think not.  Has the        Brazilian and/or
American government staged a little demonstration at the
Guarapiranga reservoir to frighten UFO investigators and the
general public into fearing all extraterrestrial contact?  In
other words, are we faced with a gruesome, carefully
orchestrated display of misinformation?  Possibly, but probably
not, and my reasons for believing this are several.

First, it would seem a fortuitous turn of events that ufologist
Encarnacion Zapata Garcia had the right friend(s) in the right
places at the right time.  If our government, and presumably the
Brazilian government, has kept a lid on similarly sensational
material in the past - and I have no doubt there is more than
ample evidence supporting such a contention - here we have an
accidental bubble that has, against all odds, escaped the pot.
It is our good fortune, you might say.

The photos are definitely causing a stir; causing many people,
including some UFO investigators, to do some new thinking.  But
the powers that control lids will be carefully double-checking
in the near future to make sure the pot is as secure as possible.
Thus I would not get my hopes up that additional homicidal,
UFO-related human mutilation cases and graphic photographs
accompanying them will surface in the near future.

If we discard the possibility of the Guarapiranga case as a
piece of misinformation, we are left with several intriguing
alternatives.  Is this the infrequent act of a rogue
extraterrestrial group which from time to time enjoys indulging
themselves in a pathological blood sport at the expense of
humans?  Perhaps.  More likely, I think, we are indirect
witnesses to an intentionally contemptuous act by a group or
species of extraterrestrial origin who would like to give other
visiting species a bad name and, as a bonus, harness mankind
into a greater fear-mentality than already binds it.  But these
are only speculations and we will have to wait until a future
time for a greater truth when more thorough revelations, and
evidence that supports them, become available.

Do we have any precedents to the Guarapiranga case?  Yes, we do.
At least one good example and the rumors of possibly another.
The case of Sgt.  Jonathan P Louette, who was stationed at White
Sands Missile Test Range in 1956 and whose mutilated body was
found on the Range three days after an Air Force major had
witnessed his abduction by a "disk shaped" object, bares a
striking resemblance to the Guarapiranga situation.  Louette's
genitals had been removed, his rectum cored out with surgical
precision and his eyes excised in a manner quite similar to the
incisions made upon our Guarapiranga victim.  And then there is
the rumor of the Texas mutilation case which occurred - and was
quickly hushed up - in the mid '60s.  I have had verification of
the legitimacy of this by two intelligence agency personnel, one
active and one retired, but have not had time to investigate
further.

At present, the rumors of human body parts found on at least one
crashed UFO in the 1940s, body parts found in a barn in the
state of Oregon several years ago or the rumor of a mutilated
Vietnam War B-52 crew will have to remain just that - rumors,
until the lid accidentally, albeit infrequently, comes ajar
again and we have some solid evidence.  But there is no denying
that the Guarapiranga reservoir case has taken us far beyond
rumor.  The evidence is unmistakable and it is sobering.  On the
one hand, it points stunningly in a UFO-related direction.  On
the other hand, I believe it would be wise of us to draw a
tentative conclusion if other less violent cases have not
already led us to do so.  We should not, in most cases,
generalize about our extraterrestrial visitors; neither about
their motives , morals nor research agendas.  And one addendum
also seems advisable: In an age when almost anything has come to
seem possible, if not probable, either cosmically or here on
earth, the wisest course might be to let our extraterrestrial
visitors demonstrate their friendliness before jumping to
conclusions about their philanthropy and opening the door too
wide.  After all, Little Red Riding Hood, nine times out of ten,
is no match for the wolf at the door.

We have seen in the past, especially in Brazil, many cases where
Human beings have been attacked by UFOs and their occupants.
This is an undeniable reality that many researchers do not want
to face.  The Fenomeno Chupa-Chupa or "Suck-Suck" phenomenon
which occurred in the Amazon and northeastern part of the
country in the '70s and '80s produced hundreds of injured people
and ultimately some fatalities.  These mostly impoverished
people were usually attacked by small probes (3-6 inches in
diameter), probably unmanned, little UFOs which emitted strong,
burning beams of light.  Many of the victims suffered not only
burns but a significant loss of blood (thus the "suck-suck"
appellation) during their encounters.  Some, such as Luiz
Fernandes Barroso, suffered appreciable mental as well as
physical incapacitation.  Barroso's mind was reduced to that of
a two-year-old long before his death.

In North America, reports of brutal manhandling by UFO occupants
are much rarer.  If homicidal, UFO-related human mutilations
have taken place they have either gone unrecognized for what
they really are or have been adeptly covered up by official
intervention.  Whatever the truth may be, the Guarapiranga
reservoir case and the startling photos which accompany it
should give us pause for thought.  I, like ufologist editor A.J.
Gevaerd, came to the conclusion after reviewing the evidence
that UFO-related mutilators were most probably the perpetrators
of the abominations revealed by the photographs of the
Guarapiranga reservoir victim.  And I believe Gevaerd is
probably right when he says most extraterrestrial visitors seem
neutral in their attitudes towards Earth and earth humans, some
are friendly and some could care less.  We had better learn, I
think, to discern the differences.  It might in the long run
save our world culture and our very lives.

[end]

Special thanks to Santa Barbara hypnotherapist Donna Higbee for
snailing me hardcopy of this article -- the pictures in this case
were worth a thousand words.